With all the progress in the anti-prohibition movement over the last year a government fear mongering effort was inevitable. After all it is the job of the government to maintain the status quo.
Last night in Canada our national TV station, CBC, aired two 1 hour documentaries about marijuana. The first one was on David Suzuki’s Nature of Things. Suzuki is very well respected in Canada, he ranked fifth in “the Greatest Canadian” vote hosted on CBC. Last night’s episode was titled “The Downside of High” and focussed mainly on the cannabis-schizophhrenia link. As Loopy Lettuce readers know that is a total myth. Suzuki quoted a study that was done in the 80s which showed a weak causal relationship at best, read the schizophrenia myth for more on that.
He also used the marijuana potency myth. “This isn’t your grandma’s weed” is the jist of it. The documentary was not objective and ignored newer studies that disprove the cannabis-schizophhrenia link. The second documentary was called CannaBiz and showed the organized crime connection in the marijuana industry. It was a generally anti-prohibition documentary and even featured interviews with Marc Emery. Suzuki’s show was clearly placed in the lineup to give an anti-marijuana message before CannaBiz was shown. It was obvious fear mongering and CBC is not alone.
The National Post published an eerily similar article the same day, Jan 28 (LINK). This article was much more blatant fear mongering than the Nature of Things. If you have any doubts this quote from the article will set the record straight,
Despite what some of its advocates might claim, any “medicinal” qualities are bred right out of the stuff that’s sold on the streets. It’s not wacky anymore. It’s dangerous.
I hope the author, Brian Hutchinson, reads this; medical marijuana is exactly the same as street marijuana. Many medical growers sell their excess in the black market and the overwhelming majority of Canadian medical cannabis users buy their weed on the “streets”. He used the potency myth too. The article says “[BC bud is] 130% more potent than marijuana produced just a decade ago.” That little “fact” was competely fabricated in order to scare readers. It is a lie. I live in BC and I rarely get the high end pot discussed in these propaganda pieces. When I do it is fucking awesome! BC bud is not one kind of weed, as Hutchinson points out it is “a catch-all term for locally grown marijuana.” There is shitty weed in BC too but overall we do have some of the best pot in the world. It is not some diabolical scheme to hook young addicts as the propaganda would have you believe, we just try harder because we love good pot.
BC bud is being demonized the same way “skunk” is in the UK. Newspapers in that country have made alarmist claims about skunk and the non-existent schizophrenia risk for some time now. The British media is the main distributor of this particular propaganda. Here are some of the UK media claims:
From this article,
Cannabis has been implicated in a string of vicious killings, including the recent stabbing of fashion designer Lucy Braham.
This article is even worse,
Addicts will kill more people unless the Government takes tougher action against super-strength cannabis, a mental health charity has warned.
This headline says it all, “Skunk Linked to Huge Increase in Risk of Psychotic Disease”
There are literally hundreds of similar articles published in the UK in the last couple years. It is all lies, and founded in gutter science. This is brainwashing. Marijuana, unlike alcohol or cocaine, does not lead to violence. It has been shown scientifically again and again.
About a month ago Canadian newspapers headlined some more marijuana junk science. Read about it here. A study from McGill University in Montreal used rats and powerful synthetic cannabinoids to show that marijuana damages adolecent humans’ brains. Paul Armentano does a great job of cutting through the media lies.
At the end of December the Conservative government began an anti-pot media campaign with TV commercials and print ads. The Conservatives also introduced legislation that will introduce mandatory minimum sentences for marijuana crimes and US style drug courts. Stephen Harper’s affinity for the US war on drugs is pretty damn obvious. Previous Canadian governments were smart enough to stay away from a full on war on drugs but Harper didn’t get the memo. The US has placed anti pot messages in TV shows since the Nixon regime. It is pretty obvious what Harper and his team are up to.
The government knows that pot is harmless, their own commission proved it in 2002. There are volumes of scientific evidence that prove marijuana is the safest drug. So why is the government spending millions of our own tax dollars to brainwash us against pot? I don’t know the answer to that. The government has something big to gain from marijuana prohibition and my bet is its money. One way or another they aren’t going to give in without a fight.
- http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/senate/com-e/ille-e/rep-e/repfinalvol1-e.htm#TABLE OF CONTENTS